Korotkoff Sounds vs. Oscillometric BP Measurement |
| Written by Kenny Andersen |
| Category: BP Measurement |
| Tuesday, 12 April 2011 |
|
Understanding that there is a dramatic difference between these two methods is, in fact, an important consideration of which clinicians should be aware. The auscultatory method has been the standard method of determining BP for over 100 years and relies on the observer to detect the audible sounds (Korotkoff sounds) that occur during constricted blood flow. The oscillometric method, employed by most clinical-grade automated BP devices, analyzes pulse waves collected from the cuff during constricted blood flow. In this case, the cuff is the sensor. The auscultatory and oscillometric methods are two very different approaches to determining the same vital sign. Each method also presents its own unique set of challenges. The manual auscultatory method is prone to poor technique, observer digit bias and poor hearing (often unbeknownst to the observer). The oscillometric method can be prone to errors when there is too much patient arm movement. In addition, each medical device manufacturer uses their own proprietary algorithm for acquiring blood pressure measurements so BP readings may vary significantly between devices which makes it important to shop around for a clinical grade device that is validated to industry standards such as the AAMI SP10 protocol. Being aware of these differences and limitations can certainly be of help to clinicians when making hypertension treatment decisions. For further information on some of the challenges and best practices when taking an auscultatory blood pressure measurement, be sure to check out our e-book “10 Steps to Accurate Blood Pressure Measurement”. We also invite you to share your comments and experiences when comparing automated and manual BP measurements. |
Recent Articles by Kenny Andersen:
Follow us on Twitter
Download Free eBooks!
Top 7 Reasons to Use Disposable BP Cuffs to Reduce the Transmission of HAIs
Also see: 10 Steps to Accurate Manual Blood Pressure Measurement
Recent Popular Posts
- 10 Things To Look For When Purchasing Disposable Cuffs
- 5 Myths About Vital Signs Automation and EHR's
- Top 7 Reasons You Should Be Using Automated Blood Pressure for Cardiac Stress Testing
- BP Differences Between Arms Could be an Early Indicator of Serious Health Risks Ahead
- You’re Doing It Wrong: New Study on BP Measurement
Posts by Date
| < | May 2012 | > | ||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Browse by Keyword
- abpm (17)
- accurate blood pressure measurement (6)
- ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (17)
- automated blood pressure measurement (5)
- automated bp (4)
- automated bp measurement (6)
- blood pressure (16)
- blood pressure cuffs (11)
- blood pressure measurement (21)
- blood pressure technology (8)
- bp cuffs (11)
- bp measurement (26)
- high blood pressure (21)
- hypertension (28)
- hypertension in children (4)
- infection control (3)
- oem (6)
- oem nibp (10)
- pediatric abpm (4)
- pediatric bp (4)

ENG
中文
One thing we like to do at the SunTech blog is share debates and comparisons of automated vs. manual auscultatory blood pressure measurements. The latest comes from 
@suntechmed
