Medical Billing Codes Gone Wild! |
| Written by Kent Lupino |
| Category: BP Measurement |
| Thursday, 29 September 2011 |
|
Right. So, for many of us who work in health-care or a health-care related field, there is significant meaning to be found in doing a job that can positively affect people’s well-being. It’s great to wake up every day knowing that you will indirectly or directly help to cure illnesses, heal wounds, save lives, and treat burns due to water skis on fire…wait, huh? Oh believe me, it’s true. At least, it is according to the soon-to-be-implemented medical diagnosis and inpatient procedure codes—codenamed ICD-10—from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). I have to confess that this is one of those times that I’m kind of embarrassed to be associated with the health-care industry. A recent, and quite entertaining, article in the Wall Street Journal* questioned the sanity of going from a system of about 18,000 codes currently in place (ICD-9) to around 140,000 codes in ICD-10, and on the face of it questioning such a change seems more than legitimate. To be fair, some of the additional details do make some sense, like code G43601: Persistent migraine aura with cerebral infarction, not intractable, with status migrainosus. Such specific detail helps payers and providers analyze and properly allocate resources to provide optimal patient care. But “W5622XD: Struck by orca, subsequent encounter?” Really? How often do people generally get struck by orcas? And I thought medical billing was already a complicated mess. Sheesh. Pardon me while I go hide under a rock. Wait…is there an ICD-10 code for being injured by a large, stony protuberance under odd circumstances? Yes, there is! W228XXA: Striking against or struck by other objects, initial encounter. Oh thank goodness! *may require subscription for full article Keywords: |
Recent Articles by Kent Lupino:
Follow us on Twitter
Download Free eBooks!
Top 7 Reasons to Use Disposable BP Cuffs to Reduce the Transmission of HAIs
Also see: 10 Steps to Accurate Manual Blood Pressure Measurement
Recent Popular Posts
- 10 Things To Look For When Purchasing Disposable Cuffs
- 5 Myths About Vital Signs Automation and EHR's
- Top 7 Reasons You Should Be Using Automated Blood Pressure for Cardiac Stress Testing
- BP Differences Between Arms Could be an Early Indicator of Serious Health Risks Ahead
- You’re Doing It Wrong: New Study on BP Measurement
Posts by Date
| < | May 2012 | > | ||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Browse by Keyword
- abpm (17)
- accurate blood pressure measurement (6)
- ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (17)
- automated blood pressure measurement (5)
- automated bp (4)
- automated bp measurement (6)
- blood pressure (16)
- blood pressure cuffs (11)
- blood pressure measurement (21)
- blood pressure technology (8)
- bp cuffs (11)
- bp measurement (26)
- high blood pressure (21)
- hypertension (28)
- hypertension in children (4)
- infection control (3)
- oem (6)
- oem nibp (10)
- pediatric abpm (4)
- pediatric bp (4)

ENG
中文
Here on the SunTech blog, we normally aim to provide valuable clinical information and helpful tips related to all things blood pressure. But allow me to wax philosophical for a moment, because…well, you’ll see why.
@suntechmed

Comments
Always to the point. I love it!